The product guide

Dashboard

Log in. Know the day. In ninety seconds

The desk opens like a morning meeting. One stance for the session, one pinned trade for the week, and a radar of what is loading up next. Every panel reads from the same engines, so nothing on the screen argues with anything else on it.

What it answers

• What kind of tape am I walking into today?
• If I only take one trade this week, what is it and where is it wrong?
• What is quietly loading up that I should be watching?

What you are looking at

• Market Pulse. One sentence on the session: whether dealer hedging absorbs moves or extends them, what the flow leans, and what breadth says. Underneath it, the index levels that matter today.
• Focus Trade of the Week. One trade, picked from every engine on the platform, with an entry, a target, a stop and the reward-to-risk. It is replaced only when it is invalidated, because one good trade beats five average ones.
• Big Move Radar. Names where flow, sentiment and dealer positioning are stacking up in the same direction before the move, with the evidence attached rather than a score on its own.

What it does not do. The dashboard summarises; it does not decide. A stance is the balance of evidence at a moment in time and it can be wrong for a whole session. The pinned trade is one idea with a defined invalidation, not a recommendation sized for your account.

The full Dashboard page

Gravity

The map dealers are hedging against

Market makers are short the options you buy, and they hedge that exposure by trading the underlying. Where they are heaviest, price gets pulled. Where they are thin, it runs. Gravity draws that surface across every strike and every expiry, rebuilt continuously while the market is open.

Basic covers SPX, SPY and QQQ. Pro and Ultimate cover every ticker.

What it answers

• Where is price likely to be rejected today, and where is it likely to be caught?
• Which strikes are dealers actually defending, and with how much money?
• Has the structure changed since yesterday, or is the map holding?

What you are looking at

• The king node. The single strike carrying the heaviest dealer exposure. Price tends to gravitate back toward it and often pins near it into an expiry.
• Floor and ceiling. The nearest heavy positive levels below and above. Dips into a floor tend to get bought by hedging, rips into a ceiling tend to get sold.
• The flip. Where net exposure changes sign. Above it, hedging usually dampens moves. Below it, hedging usually amplifies them, which is why ranges break down there.

What it does not do. Gravity tells you where the structure sits, not what will happen. A wall is a place where a move is more likely to stall, not a guarantee that it will. Heavy positioning can and does get run through, usually on news the map never saw.

The full Gravity page

Hawks

Twenty thousand prints today, the three that mattered

Institutions cannot place size without leaving a trace. Hawks watches the whole options tape and keeps only the prints with real money, real urgency and real repetition behind them, scored and timestamped the moment they cross.

What it answers

• Did anyone just place a bet big enough to matter, and on which side?
• Is this one print, or the third day of the same campaign?
• Is the position short-dated and far out of the money, meaning somebody expects a move now?

What you are looking at

• Premium, not contracts. Ten thousand cheap contracts is noise. Six hundred thousand dollars committed to one strike is a decision. Hawks ranks on money at risk.
• Urgency. Short-dated and far out of the money is the signature of someone expecting a move inside the week, not someone hedging a book.
• Persistence. The same side, same name, day after day, is a campaign. One print is an anecdote.

What it does not do. Flow is evidence, not instruction. A large bullish print can be one leg of a spread, a hedge against stock the desk already owns, or simply wrong. Hawks shows you what was bought; it does not know why.

The full Hawks page

Orbit

Your chart, with the walls already drawn on it

A chart is a picture of what happened. Orbit adds what is waiting: dealer gamma beaded down the price axis, the darkpool blocks institutions defend, and the levels that are actually load bearing, so you stop switching tabs to check whether a level is real.

What it answers

• Is this level structural, or did somebody draw a line on it?
• What is above and below price right now, and how heavy is it?
• Where is the nearest place a move is likely to stall?

What you are looking at

• The gamma column. Net exposure per strike, drawn beside the price axis at the height it actually sits. Taller means more money hedging there.
• Darkpool levels. Off-exchange blocks mark prices institutions transacted in size and tend to defend.
• Timeframes. One minute through daily, with hourly and four-hourly composed from the same session data, so a level means the same thing at every zoom.

What it does not do. Orbit draws structure; it does not predict direction. Levels move as positioning changes through the day, and a chart that shows you a wall cannot tell you whether today is the day it breaks.

The full Orbit page

Mantis

Swings that only fire when the structure agrees

Mantis scans roughly a hundred and thirty names several times a day and does nothing most of the time. A card appears only when dealer structure, institutional flow and reward-to-risk point the same way, and it arrives as a complete plan rather than a ticker and a direction.

What it answers

• Is there a multi-day setup worth taking right now, and where exactly do I get in?
• Where is this idea wrong, in price, not in feeling?
• What is the reasoning, so I can disagree with it if I want to?

What you are looking at

• The entry band. A zone, not a single price. Cards show whether price is approaching, at the zone, or already past it, because chasing is how a good setup becomes a bad trade.
• Stop and two targets. Every card carries an invalidation level and two targets with the reward-to-risk attached. The contract named is a worked example, not a recommendation: take the size and structure that fit your account.
• Lanes. At the zone, armed but not triggered, and gone without you. Only the first needs a decision today.

What it does not do. Mantis is advisory and it is wrong often. It is a scan that narrows a hundred and thirty names down to a handful with a reason attached, not a signal service with an edge to protect. Read the record before you trust any of it.

The full Mantis page

Journal

Your trades, and what they actually taught you

Most traders lose to a pattern they cannot see because nobody wrote it down. The journal keeps your own book: every trade, whether you followed your plan, and the cuts that show which setups and which hours actually pay you.

What it answers

• Am I actually profitable, or does it just feel that way this week?
• Which setups pay me, and which ones do I keep taking anyway?
• What happens to my results when I follow the plan versus when I do not?

What you are looking at

• Equity curve. Every closed trade in order. The shape tells you more than the total does.
• Plan adherence. Tag each trade as followed, not followed, or partial. The gap between the two curves is usually the whole problem.
• Cuts that matter. By setup, by symbol, by account, by hour. Enough to find the leak, not so many that you can rationalise it away.

What it does not do. This is your data and only yours. It is stored against your account, no operator or analyst surface can read it, and that is enforced by tests rather than promised in a policy.

The full Journal page

Raven

Ask the desk a question

Raven reads the same live feeds the platform runs on: the dealer map, the flow, the levels, the day so far. Ask what changed, why a level matters, or what the structure is saying, and get an answer built from current data instead of a general model guessing at markets.

Included with Ultimate.

What it answers

• What is the overall read today, and what changed since this morning?
• Why does this particular level matter on this particular name?
• How do these two setups compare on structure rather than on vibes?

What you are looking at

• It reads your screen and the market. Ask about the ticker in front of you or about the market as a whole, and it works out which you meant.
• It cites the numbers. Answers reference the levels and the flow they came from, so you can check them against the map rather than taking them on faith.
• It says when it does not know. A question outside the data gets told so, rather than answered confidently and wrongly.

What it does not do. Raven explains the data on the screen. It does not have a view on what you should trade, it does not know your position or your risk, and it is not a substitute for reading the map yourself.

The full Raven page